Featured Video

The Conservative Englishman
Breaking News

Recent Posts

Download

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Wednesday 27 April 2011

Has Prince William personally banned Tony Blair from the royal wedding

Blair's Britain, 1997-2007The decision not to invite Tony Blair or Gordon Brown to the royal wedding is a snub of historic proportions. On the face of it, excluding two Labour ex-prime ministers while inviting two Tories – Lady Thatcher and Sir John Major – looks like a highly uncharacteristic piece of political point-scoring by Buckingham Palace. No one believes the Palace’s claim that Blair and Brown were left out because they are not Knights of the Garter.
There is, however, a perfectly neat and plausible explanation, and it’s this.
Prince William cannot stand Tony Blair, whom he blames for making political capital out of the death of his mother – “the People’s Princess”, as Blair’s spin doctors dubbed her within hours of her death.
The Prince has a long memory and a capacity for cold fury. We catch a glimpse of it in the section of Blair’s memoirs relating to the week after Diana’s death: “I had also spoken to William who was not only still grieving but angry. He knew, rationally, why the week between Diana’s death and the funeral had to be as it had been. But he felt acutely the conflict between public position and private emotion.”
That anger is likely to have reawakened by Blair’s decision to record such a private conversation in the book. It is not hard to imagine William saying “I’m not having that man at my wedding” – and getting his way: after all, in nearly 60 years, only one of the Queen’s prime ministers has twisted her arm to persuade her to do something that went against her instincts, and that was Tony Blair virtually demanding that she broadcast to the nation after the death of William’s mother. And can anyone doubt that the Royal family dislikes blabbermouth Cherie more than any other prime ministerial spouse?
My guess is that the Blairs were never on the wedding list, and that this also explains the absence of the Browns. Inviting Brown but not Blair would have brought the feud into the open: the Palace could not even have trotted out its implausible Knights of the Garter story. If I’m right, then one can’t help feeling a bit sorry for Gordon and Sarah, who are being punished for the crimes of their predecessors. But perhaps they saw it coming: one doesn’t have to spend long in royal company to know that forgiveness doesn’t come easily to the Windsors.

No comments:

BThemes

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About Us